| |
|
|
| Due
to the increasing popularity of shooting flying birds, and the corresponding
need to find the birds, in the mid 19th century, the initial Retriever breeds
were developed. Some breeds, such as the Golden, were carefully bred for
by a single individual, others such as the Labrador were isolated in one
or two kennels for their development. Still others were developed as gundog
fanciers tried breeding the "best to the best" and intermixing
a wide variety of breeds and abilities. The general confusion over the origins
of the Retrievers partly lies in the fact that at this time the word "Retriever"
referred to the function rather than the breed of dog, and so any dog that
proved itself capable of retrieving was considered one, whether purebred,
crossbred or mongrel. |
| |
|
|
| Spaniels,
setters, and waterdogs quickly proved themselves the best at this type of
work and provided the foundation for all of today's Retrievers, in varying
proportions. However, the exact sequence of development is in many cases
lost in the distance of history. |
|
| |
| |
|
|
| It
seems clear that the St. John's Water Dog from Newfoundland, played a significant
role in the general development of the Retriever breeds, though no one is
quite certain of the dogs used in developing this breed. |
| |
|
|
| By
all accounts, the development of the modern Flatcoated
Retriever is credited to Mr. S. E. Shirley in the early 1870s.
St. John's Water Dogs, water spaniels, and possibly Scotch collies were
all used to develop the Flatcoat. He stabilized the wavy or Curlycoated
Retriever and fixed the type of the Flatcoated
Retriever. Shirley himself did not use Setters in his development
of the Flatcoat, but it is probable that the Retriever mixes at that point
already had infusions of Setter blood from earlier in the century. He is
known to have used Labradors once they became available outside the Buccleugh
and Malmesbury kennels.
|
| |
|
|
 |
Mr.
Shirley is well-known also for founding the Kennel Club in 1873. The breed's
close association with this man meant that they were bred at the onset for
both showing and hunting unlike other breeds that were privately bred by
estates with their own grounds and gameskeepers.
|
| |
| |
|
|
| Given
the depletion of breeding stock, especially after the second World War,
Flatcoats and Labradors were widely interbred to broaden the gene pool and
increase the number of dogs to a safer level. For example, the Labrador
CH. Horton Max, a well-regarded Labrador
at the turn of the century was actually an interbred, sired by the influential
CH. Darenth, a Flatcoat. For some reason,
while those breeders in Flatcoats are aware of this mixing, many Labrador
breeders are not. |
| |
|
|
| The
next influential patron of the breed was Mr. H. Reginald Cooke, born in
1860 who saw some of the first dogs that Shirley established, their hey
day during the turn of the century, their uncertain fortune through the
World Wars and finally their decline in numbers afterwards. His kennel,
Riverside, dominated the show scene for over sixty years. He also collected
wins in field trials. This domination was both fortunate in keeping the
breed on an even keel and unfortunate in keeping other patrons out. He was
an advocate of a medium-sized dog as being the best for work, and was concerned
about keeping the hunting ability alive in the show dogs. Contrary to popular
supposition, though, Cooke purchased many dogs bred by others and there
was no exclusive 'Riverside' strain of Flatcoats. |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| The
Flatcoated Retriever's decline directly
coincides with the Labrador Retriever's almost meteoric post-war rise in
popularity. The Labrador was considered superior to the Flatcoat in the
field trials. The domination of the Flatcoats by the Riverside kennel may
have also helped to limit the possible growth that the Flatcoat might have
otherwise enjoyed alongside the Labrador; it is unclear whether this was
beneficial or detrimental to the breed in the long run. There are risks
in being wildly popular or in being too rare. |
| |
|
|